Amazon’s new African HQ engulfed by heritage dispute
Image credit: Reuters | Mike Hutchings
The proposed new site for an Amazon HQ in Cape Town, South Africa, has attracted fierce opposition from historical and environmental campaigners, who object to the decision to build on the significant plot of land.
For the Khoi and San people – South Africa's first inhabitants – a verdant patch of land in Cape Town embodies victory and tragedy. The two communities drove back cattle-raiding Portuguese soldiers there in 1510. A century and a half later, it was where Dutch settlers launched a campaign of land dispossession.
Today, the same piece of land is again the scene of conflict, this time over a development where construction is due to begin this month and which will eventually be home to a new 70,000-square-metre African headquarters for US retail giant Amazon.
"This is where land was first stolen," said Tauriq Jenkins of the Goringhaicona Khoena Council, a Khoi traditional group opposed to the project. "We want a World Heritage Site. We do not want 150,000 tonnes of concrete."
The 15-hectare riverside area was previously home to a golf driving range and popular bar, with a small blue plaque the only indication of the site's historical significance. The land is now earmarked for a four billion rand (£200m) mixed-use development complete with a hotel, retail offices and residential units.
Amazon, which already employs thousands of people in Cape Town in a global call centre and data hubs, is lined up as its anchor tenant, with no other big names yet disclosed by city bosses or developers.
While some groups have welcomed the prospect of new jobs, the whole project – not Amazon's specific plans – has faced a backlash from other community leaders as well as environmentalists and activists. They have held marches at the site and are now threatening to take the matter to court.
According to the Observatory Civic Association, which represents a nearby residential community, close to 50,000 objections to the development have been lodged so far with city and provincial authorities.
They want the development stopped and the area declared a provincial or national heritage site. Environmentalists also agree that it is important to preserve the area because it is ecologically sensitive at the confluence of two rivers.
Amazon, in both South Africa and the US, has declined to comment on the dispute and referred media queries to the developer, South Africa's Zenprop. It in turn directed the queries to Liesbeek Leisure Properties Trust (LLTP), the structure set up to develop this specific project.
"There is no groundswell of unhappiness," said LLTP's Jody Aufrichtig, emphasising that the development went through an extensive public approval procedure. "The handful of vocal objectors who remain, who were given fair opportunity to participate, simply do not like the outcome."
Land, its history and its ownership are fraught issues in South Africa, where memories of forced removals and segregation remain fresh nearly three decades after the end of apartheid. Such sensitivities were taken into account when considering the project, Dan Plato, Cape Town mayor, said in a statement when announcing his approval of the development.
"We are acutely aware of the need to balance investment and job creation, along with heritage and planning considerations," Plato said, touting the development as a much-needed boost for Cape Town's tourism-dependent, pandemic-crippled economy.
The project will create thousands of new jobs, LLTP say, while also paying tribute to Khoi and San culture and history. Proposed designs include an indigenous garden and a heritage centre where LLTP's Aufrichtig said Khoi and San descendants will work as operators and educators.
Such efforts have succeeded in winning over some Khoi and San, including a group calling itself the First Nations Collective, which engaged directly with the developers.
"We chose cultural agency rather than the evil of government deadlock to achieve the objective of creating a liberated zone for our people," said Zenzile Khoisan, spokesman for the Collective.
Plato gave the project the green light in April this year after a two-year provisional heritage protection order instated to allow time to examine opposition to the project lapsed last year. Aufrichtig said development is now due to begin mid-June.
However, opponents such as Martinus Fredericks, paramount chief of the !Aman (Nama) Traditional Council, said they are not ready to give up. They still hope to force a review or block of the planning permission via the courts.
"We will approach the courts," Fredericks said. "We will mobilise every single Khoi and San person in the country to stop that development."
Sign up to the E&T News e-mail to get great stories like this delivered to your inbox every day.