Coal stockpiles ‘cause early deaths 25 miles away’
Although the burning of coal is widely documented as having a detrimental effect on the environment, new research has found that even just the storage and transportation of the fossil fuel has negative health impacts on residents near to stockpiles.
A team from Carnegie Mellon University found that increases in the level of coal stockpiles held by US power plants raise local air-pollution levels and result in higher than average infant and adult mortality rates in nearby communities.
“Despite the thicket of environmental regulations relevant to coal, our paper uncovers an as yet unstudied dimension of coal use that we argue requires policy intervention - the environmental consequences of the coal purchase and storage behaviour of US power plants,” said Akshaya Jha, who worked on the study.
Monthly, plant-level data on coal purchases and stockpiles provided by the Energy Information Administration was used, as well as air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency for the period of 2002 to 2012, to determine how coal stockpiles affect concentration of fine particulates (PM2.5) within 25 miles of coal plants.
They assessed how increases in PM2.5 affect mortality rates by studying mortality data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. They estimated that a 10 per cent increase in coal stockpiles led to a 0.07 per cent increase in air pollution for communities up to 25 miles away from coal plants.
They next demonstrated that a 10 per cent increase in PM2.5 levels causes average adult mortality rates to rise by 1.1 per cent and average infant mortality rates to rise by 6.6 per cent in those communities.
Finally, the authors combined their estimates for the effect of coal transportation and storage on PM2.5 and the effect of PM2.5 on mortality rates to calculate the local air-pollution costs of coal procurement to areas around power plants. They determined that the local environmental cost of PM2.5 increases is $182.67 (£140) per ton of coal stockpiled and the local air pollution cost per ton of coal delivered is $202.51.
To put these figures in perspective, the average US coal-fired power plant pays $48.00 per ton for coal, stockpiles 212,781.6 tons of coal and has 106,235 tons of coal delivered to it each month.
The authors’ results suggest that most of the local air pollution costs of coal procurement and storage are borne by the communities within 25 miles of a coal plant.
As stated in the paper: “...as people living in census tracts with power plants have lower per capita incomes and educational attainment on average relative to residents of census tracts without power plants, the highly localized environmental costs of coal procurement disproportionately affect economically disadvantaged communities.”
The authors propose low-cost policy solutions that might help mitigate these negative effects. Requiring that coal stockpiles and railcars containing coal be covered is a less expensive and unobtrusive way to reduce PM2.5 levels and reduce the environmental costs.
“These types of policies should be easier to implement relative to global anti-pollution policy initiatives since jurisdictions do not need to coordinate with one another,” said Jha.
“Given that the local environmental costs of coal storage and handling are incurred primarily by communities living near coal-fired power plants, we hope that local policymakers will consider these simple and easy solutions.”
Despite the UK’s pledge to phase out the use of coal by 2025, the soaring price of the fossil fuel boosted plans to open a new open cast coal mine in Northumberland last year.