Camera system remotely monitors vital signs of premature babies
Premature babies could be remotely monitored using cameras to detect their vital signs rather than current methods, which involve placing sensors over their bodies.
Babies who are born prematurely are typically kept warm in neonatal incubators and need to be constantly monitored to ensure they survive their first few months.
A new system is about to be tested on babies at University Hospital Zurich (USZ-CH) which uses a camera to monitor them without any physical contact.
“Skin sensors placed on the babies’ chests are so sensitive that they generate false alarms up to 90 per cent of the time, mainly caused by the babies moving around,” said Jean-Claude Fauchère, a doctor at USZ’s neonatal clinic.
“This is a source of discomfort for the babies, because we have to check on them every time. It’s also a significant stress factor for nurses and a poor use of their time – it distracts them from managing real emergencies and can affect quality of care.”
With the camera system, no physical contact is required. The baby’s pulse is detected by analysing its skin colour, which changes ever so slightly every time its heart beats.
Breathing is monitored by measuring movements of its thorax and shoulders. At night, infrared cameras take over, which means that monitoring can be carried out continuously.
The optical system was designed by a team from non-profit Swiss research body CSEM who chose cameras that are sensitive enough to detect minute changes in skin colour.
They teamed up with researchers from EPFL to design algorithms used to process the data in real time.
CSEM focused on respiration, while EPFL worked on the heart rate. “We ran an initial study on a group of adults, where we looked at a defined patch of skin on their foreheads,” said Sibylle Fallet, a PhD student at EPFL.
“With our algorithms we can track this area when the person moves, isolate the skin pixels and use minor changes in their colour to determine the pulse. The tests showed that the cameras produced practically the same results as conventional sensors.”
University Hospital Zurich will soon be testing the system on premature babies. Virginie Moser, the CSEM researcher in charge of the set-up at USZ, said: “We plan to take measurements on as many preemies as possible to see whether, under real-life conditions, the results we get from our algorithms match data collected using on-skin sensors.”
If so, the camera system could one day replace skin sensors. In addition to cutting down on false alarms, it would also be more comfortable for the babies.
Last year a Brazilian team developed a system allowing parents-to-be to view a 3D representation of their unborn babies in the womb, using a virtual reality headset.