Launch Pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center has been put up for lease by Nasa

Space company loses Nasa launch pad challenge

A commercial space company has lost a challenge over Nasa's plans to lease out a launch pad in Florida, officials have said.

Blue Origin, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, had filed a protest with the US General Accountability Office (GAO), which arbitrates federal contract disputes, but body said in a decision yesterday that it denied the company's protest.

Blue Origin is vying against SpaceX, owned by co-founder of PayPal and chief executive of electric car company Tesla Motors Elon Musk, to lease Launch Pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center. SpaceX, already flies rockets from a leased launch pad at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, just south of Nasa's spaceport.

Blue Origin and SpaceX submitted proposals to Nasa to take over maintenance and operations of Launch Pad 39A so it could be developed for commercial use, but before NASA selected a winner, Blue Origin filed a protest claiming its proposal to develop a multi-user facility better fit Nasa's declared intention for the pad.

SpaceX, which launches its Falcon 9 rockets from nearby Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, wants to use the pad as a second Florida base, but Musk told Reuters after the protest was filed that he had no problem if other companies use the launch pad if SpaceX was awarded a five-year lease.

"I think it's kind of moot whether or not SpaceX gets exclusive or non-exclusive rights for the next five years. I don't see anyone else using that pad for the next five years," Musk said in September.

"I think it's a bit silly because Blue Origin hasn't even done a suborbital flight to space, let alone an orbital one. If one were to extrapolate their progress, they might reach orbit in five years, but that seems unlikely," he said.

Blue Origin contended the Nasa solicitation "provided for a preference in favour of a multi-user (as opposed to an exclusive use) approach to utilizing the launch pad," the GAO said in its ruling on Thursday.

"Nasa took the position that neither approach was favored," the ruling said. "GAO agreed with Nasa, and in its decision concluded that there was no preference for either approach.”

Nasa had hoped to turn over pad operations to a commercial user by October 1, 2013. The delay is costing Nasa about $100,000 (£61,500) per month, agency officials said.

SpaceX said it had no comment

Recent articles

Info Message

Our sites use cookies to support some functionality, and to collect anonymous user data.

Learn more about IET cookies and how to control them