vol 4 issue 12

It was a fake, right?

6 July 2009
By Piers Bizony
Share |

One in four of the British people don't believe in the Apollo 11 Moon landing, according to a new survey for E&T. Conspiracy theorists say the pictures were faked in a studio. Here's their 'evidence', and the rebuttals to them, provided by E&T.

Flagging it up

Myth: The US flag deployed by Aldrin and Armstrong is waving in a breeze, thus proving that the astronauts were in a studio on Earth, and not on the Moon.

Fact: The flag was a dreadful design. Its uppermost edge was held rigid by a horizontal pole, which swivelled too easily at the point where it met the vertical mast. When the astronauts deployed the flag, it did wave about for quite a while, but this was residual momentum from contact with the astronauts - not the product of windy weather. In fact, that lack of wind resistance is precisely why the flag continued to drift back and forth for so long.

Crate expectations

Myth: There should have been a freshly gouged crater where the Lunar Module's descent engine blasted into the lunar soil.

Fact: The fine, powdery soil was disturbed by the downward-pointing jet of the exhaust, but the thrust was not sufficiently concentrated to gouge a crater in the topsoil, let alone its hard rocky substrate. In the vacuum of space, the LM's rocket exhaust splayed out sideways almost as soon as it escaped the engine's bell-shaped nozzle. The plume's impact on the Moon's surface was broad rather than focused.

A soft landing

Myth: There should be lots of kicked-up dust on the footpads, and on the LM generally.

Fact: Armstrong made a gentle touchdown. There is little dust because any disturbed grains of soil would have travelled some distance sideways before settling on the ground. There is no air on the Moon to slow them down. Two years later, Apollo 15's LM Falcon had a much rougher ride. Laden with extra equipment, they came down with a bump that rattled everything inside. Falcon's footpads dug deeper into the soil than the Eagle's.

Just look at those stars!

Myth: Countless stars should be visible in the black and airless lunar sky, yet there's not so much as a single speck.

Fact: An astronaut in a white spacesuit in bright sunlight needs an exposure of only a few fractions of a second, but stars are too distant and dim to register on normal photographic film unless very long exposure times are used. That's also why shuttles and space stations photographed in orbit appear against the same pure black sky.

Time and again, space travellers tell of the vast swathes of stars they can see, yet those stars never appear on their photos. Instruments such as the Hubble Space Telescope, directed towards stars and galaxies, often work with exposures lasting for hours, or even days.

Light trickery?

Myth: There should only be one concentrated and highly directional source of light in the pictures - the Sun - but many of the shots look as if they were snapped using broader and softer illumination. The harsh sunlight should create dazzling highlights opposed by pure black shadows, with no subtle shading; yet in most of the shots the astronauts seem softly lit. The shadows look as if they have been filled in by lights.

Fact: The astronauts are standing on a gigantic, bright, grey-white photographic reflector. It bounces a great deal of sunlight back into space. Photographers often use big reflector panels to 'fill in' shadow areas, especially when the Sun is bright, and the contrast range of the natural lighting is too wide for cameras. On the Moon, the astronauts are lit similarly, but by natural surroundings, not studio technicians.

My moon shadow and me

Myth: The shadows in the photographs sprawl off in different directions, suggesting multiple light sources, as in a studio.

Fact: Most of the photos were taken with wide-angle Hasselblad cameras. Multiple 'vanishing points' are inevitable in such shots.

Last word

And if none of this settles your argument with the conspiracy theorist sitting next to you at your next dinner party, point out that... Radio observers on Earth routinely timed and triangulated the signals from the Moon. Russia would have alerted the world if the radio data had seemed odd. And why would they fake it nine times, anyway?

Share |
Related forum discussions
  Topic Replies  
forum comment One in four of the British people don't believe in the Apollo 11 2 Reply

Latest Issue

E&T cover image 1604

"Should the UK's engineers be in or out of Europe? The IET sets out its official position on the EU referendum this week - will you agree?"

->

E&T jobs

  • Solutions Engineer

    Bristol Water
    • United Kingdom
    • £41,000 - 49,000

    We serve a population of over one million people and all the associated businesses in an area of 1,000 square miles centered on Bristol.

    • Recruiter: Bristol Water

    Apply for this job

  • Senior Mechanical Engineer

    Bristol Water
    • United Kingdom
    • £41,000 - 49,000

    We serve a population of over one million people and all the associated businesses in an area of 1,000 square miles centered on Bristol.

    • Recruiter: Bristol Water

    Apply for this job

  • Software Renewals Manager

    BAE Systems
    • Preston, Lancashire, England
    • Negotiable

    Software Renewals Manager Would you like to work in a resourceful and developing role within IT Services? We currently have a vacancy for a Software Renewals Manager at our site in Preston Channel Way. As a Software Renewals Manager, you will be responsi

    • Recruiter: BAE Systems

    Apply for this job

  • Technical Manager

    Aggregate Industries
    • Hulland Ward, Ashbourne
    • Attractive salary plus comprehensive benefits

    A key Technical Manager role driving product improvement and compliance with Aggregate Industries, market leader in Construction Solutions.

    • Recruiter: Aggregate Industries

    Apply for this job

  • Field Application Engineer

    Intel
    • Madrid

    Responsible for giving product presentations to the customer describing how Intel products provide the optimum solution to their application.

    • Recruiter: Intel

    Apply for this job

  • Engineers and Scientists

    European Patent Office
    • Munich and The Hague
    • See job description

    We are looking for Engineers and scientists in various technical fields for our locations in Munich and The Hague.

    • Recruiter: European Patent Office

    Apply for this job

  • Director of Product Management

    EMS Recruitment Group
    • West Yorkshire
    • Circa £70,000 PA + car allowance, excellent benefits including lucrative bonus scheme

    Our client is the undoubted world leader in their field. A highly innovative and progressive specialist electro-mechanical product manufacturer....

    • Recruiter: EMS Recruitment Group

    Apply for this job

  • Electrical Engineer

    Premium job

    Scottish Prison Service
    • Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh
    • £40,654 to £48,579 plus annual supplement of £10,000

    Build Your Engineering Career. The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) is an Agency of the Scottish Government, working in partnership.....

    • Recruiter: Scottish Prison Service

    Apply for this job

  • Sales Electronics Engineer

    Premium job

    Precision Microdrives
    • London (Greater)
    • £25,000 - £30,000 starting salary, inclusive of on-target commissions.

    Precision Microdrives (PMD) is a fast growing technology company that designs, produces and trades miniature electro-mechanical mechanisms

    • Recruiter: Precision Microdrives

    Apply for this job

  • Installation and Commissioning Engineer

    Premium job

    Crest Solutions
    • Corby
    • Competitive

    You will be involved in installation, commissioning & servicing of printing and machine vision related solutions.

    • Recruiter: Crest Solutions

    Apply for this job

More jobs ▶

Subscribe

Choose the way you would like to access the latest news and developments in your field.

Subscribe to E&T